Adult DVD Empire to Plead to One Obscenity Count

Editorial and Commentary, Other obscenity and legal cases No Comments


Originally posted at AVN.com on July 23, 2010 by Mark Kernes

According to documents filed yesterday in U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, Adult DVD Empire, under its corporate name, Right Ascension, Inc., has been charged with “Mailing Obscene Matters,” based on an FBI postal sting carried out “on or about May 29, 2007″—and will plead guilty to that count within the next few days.

According to informed sources, Right Ascension was made aware of its possible indictment more than a year ago, when FBI agents raided the company’s warehouses in Warrendale and likely seized copies of the DVDs charged in this case: A Bounty of Pain, Shattering Krystal (both from Dan Hawke Productions), Extreme Tit Torture 18 and Pussy Torture 8 (both from Galaxy Entertainment). While no information on the raid was made available at the time, the course of the case suggests that there have been ongoing talks between the company and the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), possibly represented by Robert S. Cessar, Acting U.S. Attorney for the Western District since the resignation of Mary Beth Buchanan. The case itself would have been begun during Buchanan’s tenure.

Uncharacteristically, the pending charges come in the form of an “Information,” a method of charging an individual or company with a crime without the need for an indictment, and indeed, one of the documents filed with the court is a “Waiver of an Indictment,” signed by the company’s attorney, Gary B. Zimmerman, which reads in part, “I understand that I have been accused of one or more offenses punishable by imprisonment for more than one year. I was advised in open court of my rights and the nature of the proposed charges against me. After receiving this advice, I waive my right to prosecution by indictment and consent to prosecution by information.”

Normally, a defendant in an obscenity case would want an indictment, since that would require a prosecutor to convince a grand jury that there was probable cause to believe that a felony had been committed, so the waiver suggested that a plea arrangement is in the works.

Moreover, the Information indicates charges against only the company; no individual officers or employees have been named—again, something that was likely worked out beforehand.

Finally, the charge is simply “Mailing obscene or crime-inciting matter” (18 U.S.C. §1461) rather than the more serious §1462—”Importation or transportation of obscene matters”—or §1466—”Engaging in the business of selling or transferring obscene matter” (the same charges that were filed against John Stagliano). A §1461 charge, at least according to the portion of the Information Memorandum setting forth the penalties associated with the offense, carries no jail time (which, of course, it wouldn’t since only a corporation has been charged) but includes a term of probation of up to five years, and a fine of up to $500,000. Again, all of this suggests a plea deal—and indeed, according to information received from First Amendment attorneys Lawrence G. Walters and Clyde DeWitt, such a deal has already been negotiated.

AVN has learned that the corporation will plead guilty to the single charge, pay a $75,000 fine, and be placed on three years probation—which means that if Right Ascension is charged with another obscenity offense within that three year period, it will be considered to have violated its probation, and would be liable for the full penalties associated with the offense.

AVN has also learned from a bondage movie producer/distributor who wishes to remain anonymous, that within the past six months, Adult DVD Empire has sent back its entire stock of bondage and various other fetish tapes to their manufacturers, possibly in anticipation of the plea deal.

Plea Deal Reached in Barry Goldman / Torture Portal Obscenity Case

Editorial and Commentary, Other obscenity and legal cases No Comments


Originally posted at XBIZ.com on July 13, 2010 by Rhett Pardon

Torture Portal operator Barry Goldman has reached a plea deal with federal prosecutors over obscenity charges, XBIZ has learned.

Goldman, who faces sentencing later this year before U.S. District Judge Dennis Cavanaugh in Newark, was indicted by a federal grand jury for violating 18 U.S.C. § 1461 and § 1467 for the distribution of “Torture of a Porn Store Girl,” “Defiant Crista Submits” and “Pregnant and Willing” through the mail. The videos all were mailed in 2006 and 2007.

Details of the plea were unavailable at post time, but Justice Department spokeswoman Rebecca Carmichael confirmed to XBIZ the plea and sentencing hearing for Goldman was slated Tuesday for Nov. 29.

The case has been mired in legal controversy after Goldman was indicted by a federal grand jury in New Jersey after a previous indictment was dropped in Montana.

To read the full article, go to:
http://www.xbiz.com/news/news_piece.php?id=122757&mi=all&q=goldman

2nd Circuit rules FCC indecency law unconsititional

Editorial and Commentary, Other obscenity and legal cases No Comments

The 2nd Circuit in Manhattan strikes down the FCC’s ludicrously vague indecency policy

Originally posted at Salon.com on July 13, 2010
By Jenn Kepka 

From the article:
A federal appeals court has tossed out a government policy that can lead to broadcasters being fined for allowing even a single curse word on live television.
The 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Manhattan on Tuesday found the policy to be unconstitutional. It says the policy violates the First Amendment.

To read the full article, go to:

http://www.salon.com/news/opinion/feature/2010/07/13/appeals_court_fcc_free_speech_open2010/index.html

Clyde DeWitt on Obscenity Forfeiture

Editorial and Commentary, Other obscenity and legal cases No Comments

http://business.avn.com/articles/37759.html

Letters from Max Hardcore - from prison

Editorial and Commentary, Other obscenity and legal cases No Comments

Letter From Max Hardcore

http://business.avn.com/articles/34893.html

Originally posted on AVN.com - April 2, 2009

 

Max Hardcore Appeal Argued Today

Editorial and Commentary, Other obscenity and legal cases No Comments


http://business.avn.com/articles/36648.html

Originally posted on AVN.com - April 29, 2009 by Mark Kernes

 

It’s the day Paul “Max Hardcore” Little has been waiting for for over a year: The showdown between his attorney, H. Louis Sirkin and U.S. Department of Justice prosecutor Edward McAndrew before the Eleventh Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals.Little and his company, Max World Entertainment, had been convicted on five counts each of mailing obscene material and five counts each of posting obscene material on the internet, but according to Sirkin, the appeals panel seemed more interested in an event that occurred after testimony had been completed.Click on the AVN.com link above to read the full article.

 
 

 

Letter from Max Hardcore - March 2010

Other obscenity and legal cases No Comments


Max Hardcore, aka Censorship Victim 44902-112, Writes In

http://business.avn.com/articles/37508.html

Originally posted on AVN.com - March 8, 2010
 

 

Recently, Little was moved from the Metropolitan Detention Center in downtown Los Angeles to the La Tuna Federal Prison Camp in a small town on the border of Texas and New Mexico, and it’s from there that Little sent the following open letter to the adult industry:

Click on the AVN.com link above for the letter.

It Is Time To Prosecute Obscenity

Other obscenity and legal cases No Comments


http://www.virtueonline.org/portal/modules/news/article.php?storyid=12208
Originally posted on VirtueOnline.com - March 3, 2010 by Mike McManus

In Columbus, Ohio three boys, aged 11, 12 and 14 were in Juvenile Court facing rape charges of children who were all under age 10. This was not an isolated incident. Columbus had a dozen similar cases.Why? Probably the boys watched hard-core porn on line and wanted to try it themselves. There is virtually no enforcement of laws that make obscenity a crime. Since Obama became President not one obscenity case has been filed, and there were too few during the Bush II years.

Illegal hard-core pornography is flooding our society. It saturates the internet, cable/satellite. It’s in hotels, libraries, convenience stores and is readily available to children and adults.

Sexting is the latest phenomenon among children who take pictures of themselves nude or performing sexual acts, and email them to friends.

 

 

 

Click on the link to read the full article.
[admin note - VirtueOnline.com is a morality based website. We have posted a link to their article simply to show an opposing view. As we would hope with our site in general, you are free to post your opinions, but please make an attempt to keep your thoughts non-hateful.]

Max Hardcore to Remain in L.A. Detention Center

Other obscenity and legal cases No Comments

http://business.avn.com/articles/Max-Hardcore-to-Remain-in-L-A-Detention-Center-302227.html
Originally posted February 4, 2010 on AVN.com by Mark Kernes

The Federal Bureau of Prisons has reportedly decided to keep pornographer Max Hardcore incarcerated at the Metropolitan Detention Center in downtown Los Angeles to serve his 46-month sentence for obscenity crimes.

U.S. District Judge Susan C. Bucklew had ordered Max, a.k.a. Paul Little, to serve his time at a minimum security prison. Max believed he would most likely be sent to the Lompoc Federal Correctional Complex, about 50 miles north of Santa Barbara.

Click on the AVN.com link to read the full article.

Max Hardcore May Score Sentence Reduction

Editorial and Commentary, Other obscenity and legal cases No Comments

http://business.avn.com/articles/37306.html

Originally posted on AVN.com - February 3, 2010 by Mark Kernes

Paul “Max Hardcore” Little has received another smackdown from the forces of righteousness, this time in the form of a general denial of his appeal on obscenity trafficking charges, courtesy of an Eleventh Circuit appeals panel composed of one Clinton appointee (Susan H. Black), one Bush I appointee (Charles R. Wilson) and one Reagan appointee (Emmett Ripley Cox).

The panel struck down nearly every appealable issue raised by Little’s appeals counsel, H. Louis Sirkin and Jennifer Kinsley, who also represented him at his trial in Tampa 21 months ago. The lone exception was the trial court’s use of the amount of money Little made (”pecuniary gain”) from sales of the charged videos—the European versions of Max Extreme 20, Pure Max 19, Golden Guzzlers 7, Fists of Fury 4, and Planet Max 16—in determining his 46-month sentence.

Click on the AVN.com link above to read the full article.

 

« Previous Entries